Jackson Free Press logo

This story originally appeared in the Jackson Free Press. It was added to the Mississippi Free Press website in 2025.
Note that any opinions expressed in legacy Jackson Free Press stories do not reflect a position of the Mississippi Free Press or necessarily of its staff and board members.

File Photo/Jackson Free Press

“This bill merely reinforces the rights which currently exist to the exercise of religious freedom as stated in the First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution.”

—Phil Bryant in his “full statement” on HB 1523 on Twitter

Why it stinks: First of all, the First Amendment doesn’t need any reinforcement. Religious freedom is a guaranteed right of every U.S. citizen—to practice any religion, and even Gov. Bryant is acknowledging that parts of this law are redundant and not necessary because of those rights. Secondly, he fails to see the parts of the bill legal scholars are calling unconstitutional: The religious belief that defines marriage as being between “one man and one woman” and reserves sexual relations for that marriage favors Christianity, which is likely not legal because the First Amendment also says that “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion.”