Jackson Free Press logo

This story originally appeared in the Jackson Free Press. It was added to the Mississippi Free Press website in 2025.
Note that any opinions expressed in legacy Jackson Free Press stories do not reflect a position of the Mississippi Free Press or necessarily of its staff and board members.

Credit: Melanie Boyd

Nate Silver thinks heโ€™s so smart.

Just because the New York Times statistician nailed the 2012 presidential election resultsโ€”and is generally right about everything elseโ€”everyone assumed Silver was also correct earlier this year when he predicted that Mississippi would be the last state to legalize same-sex marriageโ€”in 2024.

But gay-rights advocates say that marriage equality might be on its way to the Magnolia State much sooner. On July 12, Washington, D.C.-based Human Rights Campaign published a study showing that Mississippiansโ€™ attitudes about discrimination against same-sex-loving people are less conservative than previously thought.

HRC, the nationโ€™s largest LGBT advocacy organization, used two polling firms and found that 58 percent of Mississippians under age 30 support marriage equality. The poll also showed that 64 percent of adults in Mississippi would support legislation that protects LGBT employees from workplace discrimination. Currently, Mississippi law allows employers to explicitly punish workers who are openly gay.

Chad Griffin, HRCโ€™s president and a southern Arkansas native, cited the Southโ€™s civil-rights legacy as one reason discriminatory state laws could soon be struck down.

โ€œThere is no reason why the South shouldnโ€™t be a leader,โ€ Griffin said.

Advocates for LGBT rights are celebrating two recent U.S. Supreme Court decisions validating same-sex unions that may have a wider effect in Mississippi and nationwide than previously thought.

In one case, which challenged the federal Defense of Marriage of Act, or DOMA, the court ruled that same-sex couples are entitled to receive federal benefits. In the other, the court declined to hear a case out of California, where a ballot initiative attempted to make same-sex marriage illegal after the stateโ€™s Supreme Court found such discrimination unconstitutional in 2008.

As a result of the DOMA case, federal benefits will automatically go to couples in states that have already legalized same-sex marriage. The rulings do not overturn laws in states that have explicit prohibitions against same-sex marriages and civil unions. Among those states is Mississippi, which passed an amendment in 2004 that states โ€œmarriage may take place and may be valid under the laws of this state only between a man and a woman.โ€

Although discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation is not constitutionally protected, LGBT advocates say Justice Anthony Kennedyโ€™s majority opinion elevates sexual orientation to quasi-protected status.

โ€œThe Constitutionโ€™s guarantee of equality โ€˜must at the very least mean that a bare congressional desire to harm a politically unpopular group cannotโ€™ justify disparate treatment of that group,โ€ Kennedy wrote in his ruling.

David Dinielli, deputy legal director for the Southern Poverty Law Center, said Kennedy stops short of creating a new protected class but does apply a โ€œcareful consideration standard,โ€ meaning the courts have an obligation to take a close look at laws that appear to have discriminatory intent.

โ€œJustice Kennedy did not give it a name, and legal scholars will be asking the same questions in years to come,โ€ Dinielli told the Jackson Free Press.

Mississippi courts may be asking those questions sooner rather than later. On July 15, several same-sex couples challenged Mississippiโ€™s ban on same-sex marriage by applying for marriage licenses in several cities, Mississippi Public Broadcasting reported.

Two couples attempted to do so in Hinds County, but Circuit Clerk Barbara Dunn turned the couples away, citing state law.

The HRCโ€™s Griffin said the ruling in the DOMA caseโ€”United States v. Windsorโ€”establishes the basis for what could be a deluge of same-sex discrimination suits.

โ€œEvery case that youโ€™re seeing that is already filed, and the cases that are going to be filed in the months and weeks to come, will all cite the majority opinion in the Windsor case,โ€ he told the JFP. โ€œThereโ€™s no question that ruling is our roadmap for the future.โ€

Previous Comments

This will be an interesting fight. Our law makers have found a way to skirt most of our Federal Laws; From abortion clinics, school desegregation, civil rights, etc. The National Guard will have to be Federalized to protect Gay Rights, even when the law suits are won. This opinion is based on Mississippi’s history.


There is no good reason to deny that we must keep evolving until an adult, regardless of gender, sexual orientation, monogamy or polyamory, race, or religion is free to marry any and all consenting adults. The limited same-gender freedom to marry is a great and historic step, but is NOT full marriage equality, because equality “just for some” is not equality. Let’s stand up for EVERY ADULT’S right to marry the person(s) they love. Get on the right side of history!

MFP Solutions Lab logo

The Mississippi Free Press produced this story through the MFP Solutions Lab, supported by the Solutions Journalism Network. This series digs into Mississippiโ€™s systemic issues and sheds light on responses to them in other communities. Beyond just reporting on problems, these stories interrogate their causes and inspect potential solutions.