Jackson Free Press logo

This story originally appeared in the Jackson Free Press. It was added to the Mississippi Free Press website in 2025.
Note that any opinions expressed in legacy Jackson Free Press stories do not reflect a position of the Mississippi Free Press or necessarily of its staff and board members.

Brad Franklin

The political gamesmanship has begun. Itโ€™s nearly seven months until our next municipal elections and, already, folks are jockeying for position. You can always tell when that special time is upon us. People begin choosing sides. New Facebook pages pop up. Church congregations get just a tad thicker.

Even more telling are the incumbents who suddenly begin reminding you of their achievements while paying great attention to projects that have sat idle for three-and-a-half years. Youโ€™ll see them at COPS meetings, neighborhood forums and wherever else they can name up until the spring.

But thatโ€™s par for the course, right? Voters have gotten used to the song and danceโ€”itโ€™s an intoxicating number that all but hypnotizes a lot of folks into apathy. That complacency causes them not to get involved in the political process. Worse yet, it causes some folks not to vote at all. The premise is a familiar one. โ€œMy vote wonโ€™t countโ€ or โ€œWhy vote? Nothing changes anyway.โ€

Fact is, if we arenโ€™t careful, in 2013 weโ€™ll give those folks more reason to sit at home.

Starting now, please make sure you vet all your candidates. Iโ€™d dare say that August isnโ€™t quite the time to set firm allegiances. Instead, ask questions, attend forums or other events and talk to your neighbors. Most importantly, if theyโ€™re sitting officials, check their records. Ask yourself, โ€œHas the incumbent made any noticeable accomplishments?โ€ If theyโ€™re challengers, check their platforms. Then ask yourself, โ€œDoes the challenger have a better plan?โ€ Iโ€™m not talking about idealistic plans that everyone knows arenโ€™t doable, but tangible goals. Donโ€™t be pimped or pandered to. Beware of candidates who play on race, sensationalize crime or tell you exactly what you want to hear to get your vote.

Remember: Weโ€™ve learned from past administrations that putting time frames on promises can backfire. Crime canโ€™t be squashed in 30 days. You canโ€™t just declare that youโ€™re going to raise city-worker pay. And you canโ€™t tout successes and ignore the failures.

This time, Jackson, be smarter. The direction our city takes depends largely on the 2013 city electionsโ€”not entirely, but largely. We can either go forward or backward. The choices will be yours, and those choices are much too important for us to vote on someone because they are popular, comfortable, safe, old (or young), black or white. Theyโ€™re much too important for you to overlook someone because they have โ€œwhite supportโ€ or a โ€œshort resume.โ€

Ultimately, what Iโ€™m asking is that you take these mayoral and city council elections seriouslyโ€”because they are. Take your time. Please. Who we put in office does indeed matter. Voting matters.

Remember: Bad politicians are elected when good people donโ€™t go to the polls.

And thatโ€™s the truth โ€ฆ sho-nuff.

Previous Comments

I agree and appreciate the challenge, Brad. Very well-put. I do wonder, though, if it’s not also time to be realistic about the profound structural limits of all our candidates. What I mean is, I’d argue that we are in a national context in which the electoral process has been essentially compromised, since elections are literally bought and sold to the public, and so we have a two-party system that gives us the appearance of choice, whereas in reality, both candidates work for Wall St (or the lobbyists funding their campaings), and we don’t actually but isn’t actually democratic at its base. I’ve been away from Jackson from a long time, but now that I’m coming back, I’m anxious to see if we find ourselves in a similar situation, locally. I’m certainly not presuming the situation is the same, but if it were, I’d be more reticent than you are to equate “political involvement” with voting or simply working *within* the process of electoral “representation” — perhaps it would mean, then, organizing and working to fundamentally change the system of representation.


(Sorry, the last clause of that first paragraph above was meant to be:) “and we don’t actually have an electoral process that is democratic.”